Post by Zadkiel on Jul 18, 2016 11:18:28 GMT
Debunking myths requires an understanding of the psychological research into misinformation. But if you don't do it right, you run the risk of actually reinforcing the myth. Fortunately, there are a number of steps you can take to avoid any potential backfire effects. First and foremost, you need to emphasise the key facts you wish to communicate rather than the myth. Otherwise, you risk making people more familiar with the myth than with the correct facts. That doesn't mean avoid mentioning the myth altogether. You have to activate it in people's minds before they can label it as wrong.
Secondly, you need to replace the myth with an alternate narrative. This is usually an explanation of why the myth is wrong or how it came about. Essentially, debunking is creating a gap in people's minds (removing the myth) then filling that gap (with the correct explanation).
If you had to boil down all the psychological research into six words then it can be summed up as follows: Fight sticky ideas with stickier ideas.
Myths are persistent, stubborn and memorable. To dislodge a myth, you need to counter it with an even more compelling, memorable fact.
Secondly, you need to replace the myth with an alternate narrative. This is usually an explanation of why the myth is wrong or how it came about. Essentially, debunking is creating a gap in people's minds (removing the myth) then filling that gap (with the correct explanation).
If you had to boil down all the psychological research into six words then it can be summed up as follows: Fight sticky ideas with stickier ideas.
Myths are persistent, stubborn and memorable. To dislodge a myth, you need to counter it with an even more compelling, memorable fact.
